Ferrari disappoints itself as soon as once more. In fashionable Components 1, tire administration is a essential issue for efficiency. Failing to optimize tire utilization considerably limits a group’s competitiveness, and through the first qualifying session of the Qatar weekend, Ferrari uncovered its vulnerabilities on this space. The difficulty, exacerbated by unexpectedly cool temperatures in comparison with these in Saudi Arabia, left the Maranello group unable to adapt successfully. The Q3 session served as a transparent instance, with the Ferrari drivers showing unsure about tips on how to proceed, compounded by inadequate help from the pit wall.
Within the sole follow session out there, Ferrari targeted closely on balancing the automotive. They performed intensive laps utilizing the Arduous compound to attain constant efficiency. For Qatar, the group opted for a medium-high downforce rear wing, a call aligned with most different groups. Whereas not reaching the utmost attainable stage, the setup was barely under optimum. Important efforts had been additionally made to validate the up to date ground, that includes modifications across the edge. This improve was briefly examined by Carlos Sainz in Las Vegas through the first follow session, whereas in Losail, it was Charles Leclerc’s flip to trial it.
Inspired by constructive suggestions from automotive quantity 16, Ferrari determined to retain the up to date ground for qualifying and the Dash Race, with the choice to revert to the older specification if wanted. In the course of the restricted 60-minute session to fine-tune the vehicles, Charles Leclerc was instructed to carry out a number of managed laps on the Medium tires to check the ground. These runs, performed with out the usage of aero rakes or flow-viz, relied solely on load cells. In the meantime, the Smooth compound remained largely untested, leaving questions on its efficiency for the Dash Qualifying session.
Throughout qualifying, each drivers complained about important rotation points, which proved to be the first impediment to unlocking efficiency. The vehicles suffered from understeer that transitioned into oversteer throughout nook exits. Whereas the vehicles did generate substantial downforce, a constructive takeaway for the Maranello group, the shortcoming to take care of the goal tire temperatures robbed them of essential grip. This was an surprising setback for Ferrari, which had designed a warm-up technique that originally appeared efficient.
Including to the poor outcome was a setup that did not carry out optimally beneath the cooler circumstances. Ferrari was caught off guard, neglecting to make setup changes to counteract the dearth of rotation. As a substitute, they relied on information gathered throughout FP1, satisfied that the correct tire administration technique would yield the specified efficiency. Sadly, this strategy proved ineffective, and as soon as once more, the 2 SF-24 vehicles displayed important untapped potential. Efficiency that might have made a distinction was left unrealized on account of poor execution.
McLaren demonstrated precisely what Ferrari was lacking: wonderful steadiness, achieved via optimum tire administration. The MCL38 featured a pointy and exact front-end that labored harmoniously with the rear, sustaining secure alignment between the 2 axes. The McLaren vehicles dominated the primary two sectors of the monitor, whereas Verstappen claimed the quickest time within the third. McLaren’s tires activated extra rapidly—a attribute trait of the papaya automotive—whereas Ferrari opted for a delayed activation technique, aiming to profit from better grip throughout the remainder of the lap.
With the Smooth compounds, nevertheless, Ferrari tried to regulate preliminary tire temperatures to enhance efficiency within the first sector. This strategy backfired, resulting in front-end overheating and exacerbating the rotation points beforehand famous. McLaren additionally confronted challenges stabilizing tire temperatures however finally succeeded, whereas for Ferrari, this activity become a nightmare, derailing their complete technique through the essential moments of the session. With restricted time and already-used tires, there was no alternative for Ferrari to get well.
Mercedes as soon as once more delivered a powerful efficiency, significantly via George Russell, aided by the cooler monitor temperature of simply 21.5°C. These circumstances helped the W15 mitigate overheating points successfully. Quicker tire activation through the out-lap supplied better grip over a single lap, permitting Russell’s automotive to outperform the SF-24 by way of outright efficiency. Moreover, Russell’s exact dealing with performed an important position in extracting the automotive’s potential.
Lastly, Pink Bull. Max Verstappen admitted he wasn’t quick sufficient through the session. The RB20’s main difficulty was its steadiness. In the course of the sole follow session, the group struggled to search out an optimum working window for the automotive. Verstappen didn’t pinpoint a single downside however famous understeer in some corners and over-rotation in others, with the entrance and rear axes disconnected—a recurring difficulty in current weeks. Total, the compromise Pink Bull settled on proved much less efficient than the setups chosen by Ferrari and McLaren.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
