The latest Stocktake Report into the protection of ‘good’ motorways has renewed requires the reinstatement of the onerous shoulder. The report from Nationwide Highways, together with evaluation from the Workplace of Street and Rail (ORR), has bolstered fears that eradicating onerous shoulders has made motorways extra harmful, fairly than enhancing security and visitors circulate as initially supposed.
AA president Edmund King mentioned the newest information supplied by Nationwide Highways reveals that a number of sections of ‘All Lane Working’ (ALR) motorways on the M1 now have the next fee of individuals killed or critically injured (KSI) than earlier than the onerous shoulder was eliminated. He additionally pointed to failures in radar detection expertise, which is meant to alert management rooms when autos break down in reside lanes.
“Shockingly, the M62 between Junctions 10 and 12 suffered a system failure for nearly a month,” King mentioned. “This lack of security expertise, which drivers have been requested to place their belief in, meant they had been put in pointless hazard. It’s little marvel {that a} third of drivers say they really feel much less secure on good motorways in comparison with three years in the past.”
Rising considerations and repeated failures
The newest Stocktake follows a survey by the AA of greater than 13,500 drivers, which discovered that three in 5 need ‘good’ motorways to be scrapped and transformed again to conventional motorways with a everlasting onerous shoulder. Simply 11% supported retaining the community in its present state.
The examine highlighted that drivers really feel considerably much less secure on ‘good’ motorways, notably the place the onerous shoulder is usually used as a operating lane at peak instances. These stretches of highway had been rated the least secure, with 34% of drivers saying they felt “lots much less secure” in comparison with three years in the past.
Extra information from the ORR revealed {that a} third of radar detection methods examined failed to fulfill the required security commonplace, with two failing and deteriorating additional over a 12-month interval. King mentioned the failures additional show that the ‘good’ motorway system will not be match for goal.
AA says ‘good’ motorway experiment has failed
The AA has been warning in regards to the risks of ‘good’ motorways since their introduction in 2010, and the newest findings reinforce the organisation’s long-held view that the scheme has been a failure.
In 2020, the federal government pledged nearly £1 billion to enhance security by putting in 150 extra emergency refuge areas to cut back the space between them from 1.5 miles to 0.75 miles. Nevertheless, solely half of those upgrades have been accomplished, with work nonetheless ongoing on key sections of the M1, M3, M4, M5, M20 and M25.
King mentioned the proof is now overwhelming. “It’s time to settle for that so-called ‘good’ motorways have failed and to aspect with the vast majority of drivers who need the reinstatement of the onerous shoulder,” he mentioned.
The federal government has already halted additional enlargement of ‘good’ motorways, however with the newest Stocktake confirming rising security considerations and ongoing system failures, stress is mounting for ministers to take the subsequent step and start reversing the controversial scheme.
