A Components 1 automobile with all-wheel drive or powered by a two-stroke engine. What might sound like science fiction had been truly severe proposals for the 2026 laws. Technological limitations and the pursuits of particular person producers in the end led to an evolution of the present energy models, however the vehicles debuting subsequent yr might have been very totally different from what the general public is used to. Right here’s how.
The 2-stroke thought
In 2020, Pat Symonds, then Components 1’s technical director, spoke at a Motorsport Trade Affiliation convention concerning the ongoing work on new laws: “We have to begin taking a look at what our future energy models will probably be like. […] I’m very excited that we’re engaged on the concept of a two-stroke engine, which is at present way more environment friendly, has fewer points than prior to now, and might ship a fantastic sound.”
In a two-stroke engine, the consumption, compression, combustion, growth, and exhaust phases of the air-fuel combination are accomplished in a single engine rotation, in contrast to the 2 rotations required in a four-stroke engine. The consumption and exhaust fluid frequencies match the engine’s, permitting the method to be managed by ports opened and closed by the pistons themselves, eliminating the necessity for distribution elements equivalent to valves and camshafts.
With the identical displacement, a two-stroke engine has the potential to provide better torque and energy. Nonetheless, through the years, four-stroke know-how has prevailed resulting from higher effectivity and decrease gasoline consumption. Components 1 was optimistic about closing this hole because of advances in supplies, which at the moment are extra resistant, and digital CFD simulations. Mixed with new direct injection methods, these developments might have optimized fluid dynamics and maximized cylinder quantity utilization whereas finishing the complete combustion cycle in a single engine rotation as a substitute of two.
Opposed-piston engines
The 2-stroke venture went even additional, embracing the concept of an opposed-piston engine. This design options two pistons per cylinder, going through one another and transferring towards and away from each other throughout operation. This structure improves vitality conversion from combustion into helpful work by stopping warmth loss by the ceiling of a conventional combustion chamber, which is changed by the second piston. In line with SAE (the Society of Automotive Engineers), on the time, two-stroke opposed-piston engines promised an effectivity of 55%, surpassing the 50% effectivity of present energy models.
Listening to Pat Symonds, making use of this know-how in Components 1 was greater than only a suggestion: “The idea of an opposed-piston engine is making a comeback and is already being utilized in some highway fashions with an effectivity of round 50%. Direct injection, pressurized cost, and new ignition programs have made fashionable two-stroke engines extremely environment friendly and compliant with present emissions laws. I feel they’ve a very good future.” Nonetheless, these phrases didn’t result in additional developments.
All-wheel drive
In the end, the choice was made to proceed with conventional four-stroke know-how, focusing as a substitute on revising the hybrid system. The MGU-H, the electrical generator coupled with the turbo, was eliminated for value causes and to accommodate new producers—particularly Audi and Porsche—who had been cautious of their technological drawback in comparison with present rivals. This resolution, later confirmed within the closing laws, disadvantaged energy models of a useful supply of vitality for battery recharging, simply as hybrid energy was set to extend from 120 to 350 kW.
To compensate, one proposal concerned including one other electrical generator to recuperate braking vitality, doubling the present MGU-Ok. Nonetheless, this second unit would have been put in on the entrance axle, just like fashionable Components E vehicles, and will have been activated throughout acceleration, successfully creating an all-wheel-drive Components 1 automobile. “It’s an choice to contemplate,” commented then-Ferrari Group Principal Mattia Binotto.
Nonetheless, some present producers feared that newcomers Porsche and Audi may need a bonus on this space, regardless of plans to standardize the second motor-generator for all groups. An excellent better impediment was the added weight: the electrical motor, drive shafts, extra elements, and chassis modifications would have elevated the automobile’s weight by no less than 30 kg. Consequently, the choice was made to proceed with a single, extra highly effective MGU-Ok whereas growing a extra environment friendly automobile physique and utilizing energetic aerodynamics to cut back drag and gasoline consumption, compensating for the elimination of the MGU-H.
The transverse engine
One other proposal for 2026 concerned additional downsizing the inner combustion engine. The brand new vehicles would have adopted compact four-cylinder engines, permitting them to be mounted transversely somewhat than longitudinally. This setup would have shortened the wheelbase by 40 cm, resulting in vital weight financial savings. Nonetheless, the choice was in the end made to evolve the present V6 engines, each to capitalize on growth since 2014 and for higher engine sound.
The ultimate model of the laws nonetheless faces skepticism from a big portion of followers, however one wonders what the response would have been if Components 1 had totally pursued any of the choice concepts on the desk.
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
